Will You Help Us Save Marriages?
Support Marriage Savers
A fresh reason
to support Marriage Saver is our strategy to launch a “Marshall Plan for
Marriage,” described below. Please consider a year end gift. Send a
check dated Dec. 31, 2017 to the address above, or go to our Marriage
www.marriagesavers.org. Thanks for your consideration.
A Marshall Plan for Marriage Proposal
War II, American launched the Marshall Plan to help restore Europe’s
ago, Chuck Donovan, then Executive VP of the Family Research Council,
said the “breakdown of marriage” in America called for a similar
Marshall Plan for Marriage. Mike recently proposed a strategy to
implement Donovan’s vision, and will meet with the Family Research
Council to discuss implementing the plan.
America’s marriage rate
has fallen 57% since 1970. In 1960 72% of households were headed by
married couples, but that fell to 48% in 2015.
In 1960 430,000 couples
were cohabiting – but 19 times as many - 8 million were living
together in 2016 - four times the 2 million who married.
America’s divorce rate
after five years of marriage is 23% - triple the 8% of Britain or
France. Why? In Britain, couples have to wait 5 years for contested
divorces - a lot of time for couples to reconcile. By contrast, 32
states have a ZERO waiting period.
Four in 10 American
children are born out-of-wedlock – 20 times Japan’s 2% rate. Result:
academically, our kids are 31st in math out of 31
How could a
Marshall Plan for Marriage reverse these trends?
National ads for marriage:
I will seek foundation
funding for 30 second ads such as this: “Children of divorce and
non-marriage are three times more likely to be expelled from school
or to have a child as a teenager as are children from intact homes,
are five times more apt to live in poverty, six times more likely to
commit suicide, and 12 times more apt to be incarcerated than
children with married parents, according to a Heritage study by Pat
Fagan and Robert Rector.”
subsidizing cohabitation. Subsidize marriage instead.
cohabiting mothers receive general federal benefits, as if she were
single. But she benefits from her partner’s income as if she were
married. If she marries him, she loses those benefits. Instead,
couples who marry should receive subsidies.
couples receive $1,500 to $10,000 LESS per year in health care
premium support than cohabiting couples with the same combined
income. Such an anti-marriage bias should be removed from the law.
“Safe and Stable Families Block Grant”
million) is supposed to “promote healthy marriage.” I am
unaware of any impact. These funds could create Community Marriage
Policies, which cut divorce rates on average 17.5%.
Decrease unnecessary divorces:
Savers trained 10,000 couples whose own marriages nearly failed, to
mentor those in current crisis and saved 80% of them.
Reform No Fault Divorce
allows one spouse to file for divorce and always get it. It is
unconstitutional, depriving people of “life, liberty and property.”
Divorced men live 10 years shorter lives, for example. Every state
should require at least a year’s delay – and two years if there are
children or if contested - to allow time for reconciliation. During
that time, couples should be required to take a course on the impact
of divorce on kids and improve skills to resolve conflict.
Please Consider a
Year-End Gift to Marriage Savers
Note: You do not need a PayPal
account to use this form.
Look for the link by the phrase "Don't
have a PayPal Account" and use your credit card or checking
Marriage Savers is a 501(c)(3). Your
contribution may have tax advantages depending on your situation.